An unknown Smolensk document indicts the Tusk Government
Published: October 17, 2018
Experts from the Polish Commission for Investigation of Aviation Incidents (Miller’s Commission) who went to Russia in 2010 did not investigate the Tu-154M wreckage at all! What's more, despite their stay in Russia, they did not contact either the Russian aircraft manufacturer or the factory in which the Tupolev was refurbished. The letter, which Donald Tusk had to know, had been hidden by his administration for five years. The author of this letter died in November 2015.
It seemed that in the matter of the Smolensk catastrophe and the blatant obstruction of the investigation by the Tusk government, nothing could surprise. But it turns out that in the cabinets and drawers left by the Tusk administration, there are still documents that shed new light on the tragedy of April 10, 2010. One of them has been reached by "Gazeta Polska."
The document from August 2010 was signed by Stanisław Żurkowski - then Chairman of the Technical Subcommittee of the State Aviation Investigation Commission also known as Miller’s Commission. The letter entitled "memo note" was drafted after the meeting of members of the Millers’ Commission with a group of technical experts who accompanied Colonel Edmund Klich, an accredited Polish Representative to the Russian MAK Investigation Commission, to Smolensk. These experts went to Russia in order to investigate the crash site, the wreckage, and collect all possible information that could be useful in the Polish investigation of the Smolensk crash.
The picture that emerges from the answers given by Polish government investigators who were sent to Russia is terrifying. It turns out that the activities they were supposed to perform during their trip to Russia were pure fiction, and these technical experts of the Polish side did not carry out even basic tasks that did not require the consent of the Russians.
The document, which has never before been presented to the public before, consists of the following nine questions and answers:
1. In which technical studies of Tu-154M wreckage Polish experts took part in Russia?
Answer: They did not take part in any such technical studies.
2. What technical reports do the Polish experts have from the analysis of the Tu-154M wreckage?
Answer: They do not have any and they do not know whether any reports were made [sic].
3. What informal information about technical testing of Tu-154M wreckage the Polish experts have?
Answer: They do not have any.
4. What official and unofficial information do the Polish experts have on the subject of technical inspection and analysis of the wreckage of the Tu154M airplane?
They received verbal information from the Russians that technical inspections of radio altimeters and radio compasses would begin August 23, [2010].
So, in fact, no information was obtained because the above reply was of no value and - as Chairman Żurkowski stated in the summary of the document - was not new to the Miller’s Commission.
Click on the thumbnails below to view screen dumps from the detectors used to examine the wreckage and seats from the Polish president's plane crash in Smolensk. An "X" denotes the presence of the detected explosive substance and its type. The underlined Polish word "Probka" or "probka" in the screen dump 1 and 2, means "Sample"
Why did they all fly on the same plane?
Synopsis: January 12, 2013, Toronto, Canada. The wife of the late Deputy-Minister of Culture Tomasz Merta: "What I am about to tell you now, are suspicions - and not even my own - but, rather the [suspicions of the] individuals in the inner-circles of the [Polish] military... I heard a statement that was made - but, I am not taking any responsibility for how credible, or not credible it is. [I heard that] had the generals and journalists' not been re-assigned to different aircraft, it wouldn't have been the Tupolev [Tu-154M], but rather the Casa [transport aircraft] that would have been taken out.
Because the Generals were no longer onboard the Casa, there was no reason for it to get airborne. And for this reason it was the Yak[-40] that flew off to Smolensk. This Casa [transport aircraft] was never examined in any way. It was not subject to any examination. Aside from a single note in the deposition given to the military, no one was interested why this aircraft didn't fly [to Smolensk]. Perhaps, this is someones crazy phantasy, but perhaps it isn't.
Some [Polish] military personnel had suggested, that it [the Casa] had to stay behind at the Okecie military [tarmack], so that the explosives could be removed from it - because they were no longer needed [...] I am only repeating what I was told."
"Disarming" Explosives ...
It is worth for us to retrace the entire process of "disarming" the case of explosive substances at the crash site. It all started with the publication of Cezary Gmyz in "Rzeczpospolita" on October 30, 2012, and information that the detectors, which were used by experts in Smolensk (in late September and October) showed traces of TNT and nitroglycerine.
As it turned out, the journalist was also reporting about the indication of Hexogen. The storm broke. The prosecution denied the publication, and ultimately, the editor-in-chief of "Rzeczpospolita," Cezary Gmyz and two other journalists lost their jobs. The entire editorial staff of one of Poland’s most popular weeklies, "Uważam Rze", was also silenced.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views the SmolenskCrashNews.com. All information is provided on an as-is basis, and all data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. The Smolensk Crash News DOT COM makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.
