Shocking discoveries following latest exhumations of the Smolensk crash victims
Published: April18, 2017
wPolityce.pl reports that discoveries made as a result of recent exhumations and autopsies of the Smolensk crash’s victims justify further exhumations. According to wPolityce.pl, upon opening one of the graves, two heads, three legs, and four pelvises of unidentified victims were discovered in the casket.
Out of respect for the victims’ families, wPolityce.pl does not state exactly which of the exhumations brought the shocking discovery. However, it is clear that it relates to an exhumation carried out this year. The revelations have not been commented on by the prosecution.
Findings from exhumations so far:
Errors and anomalies discovered during the exhumations have been massive. One of the examples from last year was the grave of Piotr Nurowski, which, once opened, turned out to contain the remains of Mariusz Handzlik. The exhumation of Nurowski’s body was scheduled as the last one in 2016, but after discovering in his coffin a body identified as that of Mariusz Handzlik, a decision was made to exhume the casket from Mr. Handzlik’s grave, to identify whose remains it contained.
Mistakes and gross negligence in identifying and burying the bodies of the Smolensk crash’s victims were the reason quoted by the Prosecutor General to justify the necessity for exhumations and autopsies of bodies of all victims of the Smolensk crash. Prosecutors had reasons to believe that bodies could have been wrongly identified and injuries suffered were incorrectly described in the documentation received from the Russian authorities.
Click on the thumbnails below to view screen dumps from the detectors used to examine the wreckage and seats from the Polish president's plane crash in Smolensk. An "X" denotes the presence of the detected explosive substance and its type. The underlined Polish word "Probka" or "probka" in the screen dump 1 and 2, means "Sample"
Why did they all fly on the same plane?
Synopsis: January 12, 2013, Toronto, Canada. The wife of the late Deputy-Minister of Culture Tomasz Merta: "What I am about to tell you now, are suspicions - and not even my own - but, rather the [suspicions of the] individuals in the inner-circles of the [Polish] military... I heard a statement that was made - but, I am not taking any responsibility for how credible, or not credible it is. [I heard that] had the generals and journalists' not been re-assigned to different aircraft, it wouldn't have been the Tupolev [Tu-154M], but rather the Casa [transport aircraft] that would have been taken out.
Because the Generals were no longer onboard the Casa, there was no reason for it to get airborne. And for this reason it was the Yak[-40] that flew off to Smolensk. This Casa [transport aircraft] was never examined in any way. It was not subject to any examination. Aside from a single note in the deposition given to the military, no one was interested why this aircraft didn't fly [to Smolensk]. Perhaps, this is someones crazy phantasy, but perhaps it isn't.
Some [Polish] military personnel had suggested, that it [the Casa] had to stay behind at the Okecie military [tarmack], so that the explosives could be removed from it - because they were no longer needed [...] I am only repeating what I was told."
"Disarming" Explosives ...
It is worth for us to retrace the entire process of "disarming" the case of explosive substances at the crash site. It all started with the publication of Cezary Gmyz in "Rzeczpospolita" on October 30, 2012, and information that the detectors, which were used by experts in Smolensk (in late September and October) showed traces of TNT and nitroglycerine.
As it turned out, the journalist was also reporting about the indication of Hexogen. The storm broke. The prosecution denied the publication, and ultimately, the editor-in-chief of "Rzeczpospolita," Cezary Gmyz and two other journalists lost their jobs. The entire editorial staff of one of Poland’s most popular weeklies, "Uważam Rze", was also silenced.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views the SmolenskCrashNews.com. All information is provided on an as-is basis, and all data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. The Smolensk Crash News DOT COM makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.
