New evidence of explosion on board of Tu154M found
Published: October 25, 2017
"There was an indication that an explosion had occurred on the plane," said Grzegorz Wierzchołowski in the latest episode of the "10.04.2010 Facts", shown by the TV Republika. This evidence comes from further analysis of the flight data recorder. The author of the article "Sensational discovery of the Smolensk Sub-commission," published in "Gazeta Polska," spoke in detail about what this groundbreaking finding is.
This is probably the strongest evidence found thus far. If it turns out that the temperature increase could not be caused by anything else other than explosion. This temperature increase was registered by the sensor, outside the aircraft, and it triggered a series of breakdowns in the aircraft. It is the cause of the failure. This increase was recorded at the altitude of about 40 meters above the ground - noted the journalist.
The findings of the previous commission that was analyzing this flight data recorder look like a forgery.
It turns out that when examining various documents about the disaster, the current Smolensk Sub-Commission, came across a passage in the Miller's file that was deleted by the Miller’s commission. We wrote about it few years ago. The part that was deleted was subsequently replaced with a Russian copy. The missing part concerns this very intriguing record of the temperature jump. It turns out that the study of documents and records left by the Miller’s commission resulted in this breakthrough finding - stressed Wierzchołowski.
We do not know who specifically deleted this part. A fragment of the Russian record of unknown origin was pasted over the deleted part which also contains some errors. The actions of the previous commission look like a forgery. The person who ordered it could have had an interest in doing this - said Wierzchołowski.
After such an event, I, as a journalist, immediately began to think that this has to be checked. From the very beginning, along with my colleagues from the editorial board, we have investigated this matter. There was a lot of media misinformation, a lot of manipulations, and we had to separate the beans from the chaff. We tried to reach the experts. It was difficult because some people were afraid.
In the first weeks after the crash nobody wanted to talk about their suspicions. The editorial staff of the Gazeta Polska was the only one determined to take on this matter. The parliamentary committee under the leadership of Antoni Macierewicz was not yet operational. For us, it was the normal pursuit of the truth," the journalist said.
The government had to have something to hide when it decided to choose the investigation method that favored the Russians, and the Poles were like petitioners towards the Russians. Maybe the Russians had some hooks, some form of pressure on the Tusk government, or it was simply convenient to opt to act subservient. This was done in order to make sure that such evidence disappeared - noted Wierzchołowski.
Click on the thumbnails below to view screen dumps from the detectors used to examine the wreckage and seats from the Polish president's plane crash in Smolensk. An "X" denotes the presence of the detected explosive substance and its type. The underlined Polish word "Probka" or "probka" in the screen dump 1 and 2, means "Sample"
Why did they all fly on the same plane?
Synopsis: January 12, 2013, Toronto, Canada. The wife of the late Deputy-Minister of Culture Tomasz Merta: "What I am about to tell you now, are suspicions - and not even my own - but, rather the [suspicions of the] individuals in the inner-circles of the [Polish] military... I heard a statement that was made - but, I am not taking any responsibility for how credible, or not credible it is. [I heard that] had the generals and journalists' not been re-assigned to different aircraft, it wouldn't have been the Tupolev [Tu-154M], but rather the Casa [transport aircraft] that would have been taken out.
Because the Generals were no longer onboard the Casa, there was no reason for it to get airborne. And for this reason it was the Yak[-40] that flew off to Smolensk. This Casa [transport aircraft] was never examined in any way. It was not subject to any examination. Aside from a single note in the deposition given to the military, no one was interested why this aircraft didn't fly [to Smolensk]. Perhaps, this is someones crazy phantasy, but perhaps it isn't.
Some [Polish] military personnel had suggested, that it [the Casa] had to stay behind at the Okecie military [tarmack], so that the explosives could be removed from it - because they were no longer needed [...] I am only repeating what I was told."
"Disarming" Explosives ...
It is worth for us to retrace the entire process of "disarming" the case of explosive substances at the crash site. It all started with the publication of Cezary Gmyz in "Rzeczpospolita" on October 30, 2012, and information that the detectors, which were used by experts in Smolensk (in late September and October) showed traces of TNT and nitroglycerine.
As it turned out, the journalist was also reporting about the indication of Hexogen. The storm broke. The prosecution denied the publication, and ultimately, the editor-in-chief of "Rzeczpospolita," Cezary Gmyz and two other journalists lost their jobs. The entire editorial staff of one of Poland’s most popular weeklies, "Uważam Rze", was also silenced.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views the SmolenskCrashNews.com. All information is provided on an as-is basis, and all data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. The Smolensk Crash News DOT COM makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.
